Modeling and Control of Steam Methane Reforming Process Using Model Predictive Control

Authors

  • Tan Li Ting Faculty of Chemical and Energy Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
  • Nabilla Wahyu Hasanah Faculty of Chemical and Energy Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
  • Fakhrony Sholahudin Rohman Process Systems Engineering Centre (UTM-PROSPECT), Research Institute of Sustainable Environment (RISE), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
  • Dinie Muhammad Faculty of Chemical and Energy Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

Keywords:

Steam Methane Reforming, Model Predictive Control, dynamic simulation, hydrogen production, process control

Abstract

This study focuses on modeling and controlling steam methane reforming (SMR) using model predictive control (MPC). The problem in the SMR plant is the limitation of the conventional control in controlling a wide range of operating conditions. The nonlinear dynamic behavior of the SMR process has further complicated the situation, as existing methods lack the adaptability to the changing operating conditions and disturbances. To address these challenges, MPC control scheme is proposed. The development of MPC involves developing a simulation process for Steam Methane Reforming (SMR) using Aspen Plus, creating the process model of SMR using the system identification technique, and designing the MPC control scheme. The development of a simulation plant includes constructing the process flowsheet, determining kinetics parameters, and creating a dynamic model. Model input-output selection and data generation are performed to facilitate the development of the process model. Based on the state space identification technique, the process model is developed with a normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) of 0.8567 for CV1 and 0.3005 for CV2. Then, the core focus lies in designing the MPC control structure and tuning the MPC for enhanced performance. During set point tracking, starting from steady-state hydrogen production and increasing by 20% at 2 minutes, the state-space MPC outperformed the PID controllers, displaying more aggressive capabilities in reaching the desired set point. For the disturbance rejection test, the state-space MPC is able to control the reactor outlet temperature with minimal overshoot, as seen in the CV2 profile. This behavior is due to the predictive capabilities of MPC, enabling quicker controller actions than PID. By addressing the traditional control limitations, the proposed MPC aims to enhance the operation and control of SMR plants while optimizing hydrogen production through advanced control strategies. 

References

Kabeyi, M.J.B. and O.A. Olanrewaju, Sustainable Energy Transition for Renewable and Low Carbon Grid Electricity Generation and Supply. Frontiers in Energy Research, 2022. 9.

Hannun, R.M. and A.H. Abdul Razzaq, Air Pollution Resulted from Coal, Oil and Gas Firing in Thermal Power Plants and Treatment: A Review. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2022. 1002(1): p. 012008.

Cao, J., et al., Current status, future prediction and offset potential of fossil fuel CO2 emissions in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2023. 426: p. 139207.

Bruhwiler, L., et al., Observations of greenhouse gases as climate indicators. Clim Change, 2021. 165(1): p. 12.

Aziz, M. Liquid Hydrogen: A Review on Liquefaction, Storage, Transportation, and Safety. Energies, 2021. 14, DOI: 10.3390/en14185917.

Lee, S., et al., Scenario-Based Techno-Economic Analysis of Steam Methane Reforming Process for Hydrogen Production. Applied Sciences, 2021. 11(13): p. 6021.

Li, S., et al., Hydrogen Production: State of Technology. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environment, 2020.

Wang, J., et al., Transient numerical modeling and model predictive control of an industrial-scale steam methane reforming reactor. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021. 46(29): p. 15241-15256.

Çepelioğullar Mutlu, Ö. and T. Zeng, Challenges and Opportunities of Modeling Biomass Gasification in Aspen Plus: A Comprehensive Review. Chemical Engineering & Technology, 2020. 43.

Oechsler, B., et al., Simulation and Control of Steam Reforming of Natural Gas—Reactor Temperature Control Using Residual Gas. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2017. 56.

Sartipizadeh, H. and T.L. Vincent, Robust model predictive control of a catalytic autothermal methane reformer for fuel cell applications. Control Engineering Practice, 2018. 76: p. 31-40.

Li, J., et al., Improved PID Controller Based on BP Neural Network. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2023. 2479(1): p. 012062.

Zanoli, S.M. and L. Orlietti. Steam reforming plant optimization with Model Predictive Control. in 2013 IEEE 18th Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation (ETFA). 2013.

Gous, G.Z., et al., Advanced Regulatory Control Techniques for Improved Averaging Level Control Performance. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2023. 62(38): p. 15578-15587.

Correa Córdova, M.L., High Performance Implementation of MPC Schemes for Fast Systems. 2016, Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru (Peru): Peru. p. 140.

Ławryńczuk, M. Approximate state-space model predictive control. in 2015 20th International Conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics (MMAR). 2015.

Arumugasamy, S.K. and Z. Ahmad, Model Predictive Control (MPC) and Its Current Issues in Chemical Engineering. Chemical Engineering Communications, 2012. 199: p. 472-511.

Alatiqi, I.M. and A.M. Meziou, Dynamic simulation and adaptive control of an industrial steam gas reformer. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 1991. 15(3): p. 147-155.

Sankararao, B. and J.H. Lee, Dynamic modeling, simulation and control (using MPC) of an industrial steam reformer. 2012 12th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems, 2012: p. 594-600.

Kyriakides, A.-S., et al., Model Predictive Control for Hydrogen Production in a Membrane Methane Steam Reforming Reactor. Chemical engineering transactions, 2016. 52: p. 991-996.

Galusnyak, S. and S. Dragan, Mathematical modeling of steam methane reforming process. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Chemia, 2019. 64: p. 7-18.

Simkoff, J.M., et al., Plant–Model Mismatch Estimation from Closed-Loop Data for State-Space Model Predictive Control. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2018. 57(10): p. 3732-3741.

Zhang, R., S. Wu, and F. Gao, State Space Model Predictive Control for Advanced Process Operation: A Review of Recent Development, New Results, and Insight. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2017. 56(18): p. 5360-5394.

Wang, G., et al., State-Space Model Predictive Control Method for Core Power Control in Pressurized Water Reactor Nuclear Power Stations. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 2017. 49(1): p. 134-140.

Camacho, E.F., et al. Incremental State-Space Model Predictive Control of a Fresnel Solar Collector Field. Energies, 2019. 12, DOI: 10.3390/en12010003.

Darby, M.L. and M. Nikolaou, MPC: Current practice and challenges. Control Engineering Practice, 2012. 20: p. 328-342.

Othman, M., U. Imran, and A. Ahmad, Environment and Economic Assessment of Hydrogen Production from Methane and Ethanol. 2019.

Agyekum, E.B., et al. A Critical Review of Renewable Hydrogen Production Methods: Factors Affecting Their Scale-Up and Its Role in Future Energy Generation. Membranes, 2022. 12, DOI: 10.3390/membranes12020173.

Nikolaidis, P. and A. Poullikkas, A comparative overview of hydrogen production processes. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017. 67: p. 597-611.

Bej, B., N.C. Pradhan, and S. Neogi, Production of hydrogen by steam reforming of methane over alumina supported nano-NiO/SiO2 catalyst. Catalysis Today, 2013. 207: p. 28-35.

Chen, Z., et al., Simulation for steam reforming of natural gas with oxygen input in a novel membrane reformer. Fuel Processing Technology, 2003. 83(1): p. 235-252.

Singh, A.P., et al., Steam reforming of methane and methanol in simulated macro & micro-scale membrane reactors: Selective separation of hydrogen for optimum conversion. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2014. 18: p. 286-295.

Favoreel, W., B. De Moor, and P. Van Overschee, Subspace state space system identification for industrial processes. Journal of Process Control, 2000. 10(2): p. 149-155.

Parihar, S., et al. Model Predictive Control and Its Role in Biomedical Therapeutic Automation: A Brief Review. Applied System Innovation, 2022. 5, DOI: 10.3390/asi5060118.

Khzouz, M. and E.I. Gkanas Experimental and Numerical Study of Low Temperature Methane Steam Reforming for Hydrogen Production. Catalysts, 2018. 8, DOI: 10.3390/catal8010005.

Seborg, D.E., et al., Process Dynamics and Control, 4th Edition. 2016: Wiley.

Dinie, M., et al., Temperature control of low density polyethylene (LDPE) tubular reactor using Model Predictive Control (MPC). IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2020.

Published

15-12-2023

How to Cite

[1]
“Modeling and Control of Steam Methane Reforming Process Using Model Predictive Control ”, AJPC, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–13, Dec. 2023, Accessed: Mar. 23, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://mypcs.com.my/journal/index.php/ajpc/article/view/24

Similar Articles

1-10 of 32

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.