Model Predictive Control for Efficient Process Control: A Case Study for Absorber-Stripper System with MEA in Hydrogen Plant

Authors

  • Rendra Panca Anugraha Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Technology and Systems Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
  • Renanto Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Technology and Systems Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
  • Juwari Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Technology and Systems Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
  • Hugo Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Technology and Systems Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
  • Bernardus Krisna Brata Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Technology and Systems Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember

Keywords:

Carbon Capture, Process Control, Model Predictive Control, Monoethanolamine

Abstract

Control mechanisms are essential for all operations in chemical processing facilities, including the absorber-stripper system. This system, which is utilized for CO2 capture, is a common feature in hydrogen plants that use steam-methane reforming technology to purify their flue gas (post- combustion). The primary objective of this system is to maximize CO2 recovery in a cost-effective manner. Given the dynamic nature of plant operations, with frequent changes in production capacity, a robust controller is crucial for maintaining system stability. Model Predictive Control (MPC) is a widely used control method. This study focuses on developing a control simulation for an absorber- stripper system using monoethanolamine solution (MEA) and implementing it with MPC. The steady- state system is designed using Aspen Plus and integrated with MATLAB/Simulink to construct a multi- input-multi-output controller with MPC. The simulation aims to regulate the CO2 recovery within a specific range of input disturbances while ensuring that the system operates within acceptable operating conditions. This is achieved by controlling all potential manipulated variables, such as flow of MEA solution to both absorber and stripper, flow of cooling and heating agent, and make up water. A comparison with the traditional PID control approach is also presented as part of this research. It is concluded from the result that MPC Controller is superior than PID. The MPC controller exhibits superior performance by having less settling time. This is accomplished by effectively minimizing transient deviations from the desired output.

References

Kidnay, A. J., Parrish, W. R., & McCartney, D. G. (2019). Fundamentals of Natural Gas Processing. In Fundamentals of Natural Gas Processing. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429464942

Arce, A., Mac Dowell, N., Shah, N., & Vega, L. F. (2012). Flexible operation of solvent regeneration systems for CO2 capture processes using advanced control techniques: Towards operational cost

minimisation. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 11, 236–250. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.09.004

Harun, N., Nittaya, T., Douglas, P. L., Croiset, E., & Ricardez-Sandoval, L. A. (2012). Dynamic simulation of MEA absorption process for CO2 capture from power plants. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 10, 295–309. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.06.017

Patidar, A. K., Singh, R. K., & Choudhury, T. (2023). The prominence of carbon capture, utilization and storage technique, a special consideration on India. Gas Science and Engineering, 115, 204999. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JGSCE.2023.204999

Seborg, D. E., Edgar, T. F., Mellichamp, D. A., & III, F. J. D. (2016). Process Dynamics and Control (4th Edition). In John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Ang, K. H., Chong, G., & Li, Y. (2005). PID control system analysis, design, and technology. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 13(4), 559–576. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2005.847331

Taipabu, M. I., Viswanathan, K., Wu, W., Handogo, R., Mualim, A., & Huda, H. (2023). New improvement of amine-based CO2 capture processes using heat integration and optimization. Chemical Engineering and Processing-Process Intensification, 109532.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2023.109532

Lin, Y.-J., Pan, T.-H., Wong, D. S.-H., Jang, S.-S., Chi, Y.-W., & Yeh, C.-H. (2011). Plantwide Control of CO2 Capture by Absorption and Stripping Using Monoethanolamine Solution. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 50(3), 1338–1345. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie100771x

He, Z., & Ricardez-Sandoval, L. A. (2016b). Dynamic modelling of a commercial-scale CO2 capture plant integrated with a natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) power plant. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 55, 23–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.11.001

Aspen Technology, I. . (2012). Aspen Plus : Rate-Based Model of the CO2 Capture Process by MEA using Aspen Plus.

Liu, B., Han, Y., Liu, B., Ge, X., & Yuan, X. (2023). Optimal design, intelligent fuzzy logic and model predictive control for high-purity ethyl-methyl carbonate and diethyl carbonate production using reactive dividing wall column. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 195.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2023.06.022

Taqvi, S. A. A., Zabiri, H., Singh, S. K. M., Tufa, L. D., & Naqvi, M. (2023). Investigation of control performance on an absorption/stripping system to remove CO2 achieving clean energy systems. Fuel, 347, 128394. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2023.128394

Lahiri, S. K. (2017). Multivariable Predictive Control: Applications in Industry. In Multivariable Predictive Control.

Published

15-12-2023

How to Cite

[1]
“Model Predictive Control for Efficient Process Control: A Case Study for Absorber-Stripper System with MEA in Hydrogen Plant”, AJPC, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–13, Dec. 2023, Accessed: Jul. 12, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://mypcs.com.my/journal/index.php/ajpc/article/view/21

Similar Articles

1-10 of 32

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.